But, sometimes, it's a little less enjoyable.
I'm not just talking about those positions that you're summarily rejected for -- even though you match up completely with the duties, you still don't even get an interview. In one case, I was told, "You haven't worked for a large company." So, I explained, I've been an editor of magazines with readerships near 70,000, and I was writing on a monthly basis. To which, the response was, "yes, but that wasn't communication." Huh?
(I've decided to simply write off companies like that ... there are companies that will look at what you *can* do for them; and companies that only want to see what you *have* done for others. I suspect, we'll see far fewer of the latter, as they go out of business. Today's marketplace doesn't reward standing still.
It's like dating. If a girl asks, "What kind of car do you drive?" and you say, "Yes, I have a car." and she asks, again, "OK, but what kind of car *is* it?" She's probably not the right girl.)
Tuesday was a pretty good day for me -- I got three phone calls for prospective jobs. One was for today (Thursday); one will happen in a couple of weeks; one was a preliminary phone screen.
I was excited about the position today; but predominantly because it was so close to my home. In fact, I hadn't even applied for the role yet (it was on my list to apply). The HR Director had found me through a resume search online. As I read through the role, I realized that the position title (manager of corporate communications) was a bit misleading -- this was a pretty hardcore marketing job. Still, I did some other research and saw some opportunity so I headed to the interview.
We began talking about my background; good conversational pace. Things were going well. We talked about my previous positions, and I outlined my accomplishments, my strengths and what I bring to the table. And then, she started asking about marketing responsibilities.
The long and short of it is that they weren't looking for a manager of corporate communications. They were looking for a marketing director. But, even more interesting, they weren't looking for just a strategic marketing director -- they also wanted someone who was an expert graphic designer. And a world-class writer. And who could manage the company intranet. And handle trade show responsibilities. And manage/update the company's internet pages.
She realized I wasn't the right candidate for this Superman-type position (I don't really know *anyone* who would be able to do all these tasks), and she apologized for wasting my time.
A few thoughts on this:
- The company is larger than either of my previous two companies (my last two companies -- at their largest -- were about 160 and 250 people respectively. This company has more than 300 employees). The marketing and communications departments at those previous companies totaled 10 and 15 respectively. At this company, the department was comprised of ONE person.
- I explained that they were looking for at least two people, probably more, because of the varied skills they were looking for. She seemed non-plussed by this.
- I then asked who handled their internal communications functions. A company of 300+ surely had need of that. She explained those responsibilities were *also* handled by this position (at this point, I think I may have wondered if the company provided a boxspring and mattress for the person to simply reside in the building). I explained how internal communications is a vital part of the business; and -- having checked out the company on Glassdoor and Indeed, there surely was a need (comments there were somewhat damning of the company culture). I also discussed the company website (they're a b2b company with ZERO interaction with the public/consumers. In my opinion, the only thing that should be on the website is a company history, contacts and a way for prospective employees to learn about the culture (without having to head to Glassdoor). She sat there and nodded at me; but never commented nor did she ask me for more information. Again, this is the HR director - the person who should be most concerned with employee engagement, morale and securing the best possible workers for her company.
- Finally, and most puzzling. This person searched for my resume, found it, and called me! Nowhere on my resume does it intimate that I'm skilled in marketing, let alone graphic design work. Why was I even called in? I explained she should change the title to "Marketing Director" - not simply because it's unfair to communications professionals who might apply; but, quite honestly, because the people she DOES want to have apply, won't be applying when the title is "manager of corporate communications." Those are two completely different skillsets. I received a blank stare back, to that suggestion.
So, basically, *everything* I preach about creating an engaged workforce would have been like Kryponite to this organization. Yes, it would have been nice to work so close to home; but it's far nicer to have a job that offers challenges that are at least surmountable. I don't have any interest in being set up to fail at a company. I've been down that road, and it's far from fun.
3 comments:
You should have been paid for your consulting services!
SMDH over the no friend & family policy since a number of companies attribute their referral program as one of their successful recruitment initiatives.
Reading the description, the company needs at least 4-5 people to handle all of the duties that fall under the jurisdiction of this position. Perhaps the company should rename itself "slave ship."
@Liz - the ONLY reason I condoned the "no referral" approach was because this company worked heavily in the prescription drug/narcotic/pharmaceutical industry. I still think it's a little silly (because, if you're going to do great HR screening, wouldn't you do it regardless of how the candidate was found)?
But, if there's any place that it makes sense to ban referrals, I guess it's there.
Post a Comment